Iowa Supreme Court Affirms Decision Holding Contractor Acted as Unlicensed Public Adjuster

On February 14, 2020, the Iowa Supreme Court issued decisions in three companion cases involving residential contractor, 33 Carpenters Construction, affirming the Court of Appeals’ decisions against such contractor. Contractors who interact with their clients’ property insurers, including storm response contractors and other remodeling companies, need to take a close look at their practices and seek legal advice as necessary regarding changes that need to be made to their job practices, contracts, website, and other marketing materials to comply with Iowa law.

In the 33 Carpenters case, the Iowa Supreme Court, agreeing with the Iowa Court of Appeals, concluded that the storm response contractor acted as an unlicensed public adjuster in its dealings with the homeowner’s property insurer by advocating for and assisting its client-homeowner in the handling and settlement of the insurance claim. The Court also found problems in the contractor’s statements on its website in which the contractor marketed itself as working directly with its clients’ insurers and advocating on its clients’ behalf regarding their insurance claims.

Because the Court held that the contractor acted as an unlicensed public adjuster, the Court consequently ruled that the contractor’s Assignment of Claim and Benefits--which would have otherwise entitled the contractor to payment for its work--was void and unenforceable.

Notably, many contractors do not fully understand this area of law. Since 2007, the Iowa Code has provided that a person acts as an unlicensed public adjuster if a person, for compensation or value, acts on behalf of an insured, by:

(a) Acting for, assisting, or aiding an insured in negotiating for or effecting the settlement of the homeowner’s claim with its property insurer;

(b) Advertising or soliciting business or representing to the public that the person is a public adjuster of claims; or

(c) Directly or indirectly soliciting business investigating or advising an insured about the homeowner’s claim with its property insurer.

Thus, whenever a contractor assists its client in negotiating or handling the client’s insurance claim, or otherwise advocates for its client with the property insurer, that contractor is running the risk of the Insurance Commissioner or a court holding that it is an unlicensed public adjuster. Frankly, it can be difficult for a contractor to strictly abide by the law, but there are numerous steps--some smaller and some larger-- that a contractor can and should take to substantially lessen its risk of being deemed to be an unlicensed public adjuster.

If your company works with the property insurers of your clients and you have any questions about this area of law or anything addressed in this article, please contact Jodie McDougal at or at 515.242.8971.

33 Carpenters Construction, Inc. vs. State Farm Life and Casualty Company
33 Carpenters Construction, Inc. vs. IMT Insurance Company
33 Carpenters Construction, Inc. vs. The Cincinnati Insurance Company 

  • Jodie Clark McDougal

    In her construction work, Jodie counsels clients within the commercial and residential construction industries including general contractors; homebuilders; construction management companies; architectural, engineering ...

Stay Informed Flag
Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.