In Subchapter V cases, the confirmation of a consensual, rather than a nonconsensual plan, carries significant benefits. How should the courts treat classes of creditors that do not vote on the plan? Can the failure to vote render the plan nonconsensual?
- Firm NewsFredrikson Expands Mergers & Acquisition Group with Three Attorneys
- Firm NewsReal Estate Attorney Rob Williams Joins Fredrikson
- Firm NewsFredrikson Attorneys Named 2025 Minnesota Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
- Legal UpdateTermination of Temporary Protected Status for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, and Employer I-9 Obligation