Kara K. Fairbairn

Counsel

Email: kfairbairn@fredlaw.com
Office: 612.492.7144
Assistant: Anise Krull, 612.492.7635

Follow on Twitter Download vCard View LinkedIn Profile Print Full Bio

PRIMARY SERVICES

Intellectual Property Patents Life Sciences

ADDITIONAL EXPERTISE

Agribusiness & Cooperatives

"I enjoy learning my client’s business and providing strategic patent advice that focuses on business goals."

Overview

Kara is an experienced patent attorney working with life science, medical device and biotechnology companies.

Kara helps individual designers and companies by creating global design patent protection strategies that include obtaining global design patent protection for their designs, performing freedom-to-operate analyses on their designs, attacking and designing around competitor patents, and enforcing their design patents against competitors. She helps also designers by creating anti-counterfeiting strategies for protecting their designs. She has filed hundreds of design patent applications covering a variety of designs.

Experience

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

Representative design patent experience include designs for medical devices, recording equipment, electronics, lighting, vehicles, punch tools, furniture, cookware, serveware, gardening equipment, landscaping materials, packages, containers, clothing, fashion accessories and footwear.
Representative medical diagnostic patent technologies include genetic tests (including tests using next generation sequencing methods), cancer diagnostic and genetic susceptibility tests, cancer treatment methods, blood control diagnostics, autoimmune diagnostics, gastric emptying and celiac disease breath test diagnostics and pulmonary disease diagnostics.
Representative medical device technologies include drug delivery devices, surgical blankets, guidewires, hearing implants, delivery catheters, heart valves, intravascular ultrasound systems, vessel occluders, vascular probes, anastomic blood vessel couplers, intravascular blood flow detection devices, blood vessel clamps, dermatology treatment devices, ear suction devices, cross-linked animal tissue for suture buttressing applications
Representative biotech technologies include human and animal bacterial vaccines, stem cell and blood cord technology, immunoassays, dietary supplements, cancer drug pharmaceuticals.

Articles & Presentations

Federal Circuit Strikes Another Blow Against Patentable Subject Matter in Biotechnology

April 26, 2016

By Katherine J. Rahlin & Kara K. Fairbairn

In Genetic Technologies Ltd. v. Merial LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion holding yet another biotech patent invalid. The Federal Circuit applied the two-step Alice/Mayo test for patent eligibility in upholding the district court’s finding of invalidity. The patent at issue, U.S. Patent No. 5,612,179 (the ‘179 patent), is directed to methods of analyzing DNA sequences to detect an allele of gene by amplifying non-coding regions of the DNA. The parties agreed that claim 1 is representative of all of the invalidated claims:

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Patent on Cloned Animals to the Inventors of Dolly the Sheep

May 12, 2014

By Mia E. Mendoza and Kara K. Fairbairn

Last week, in the case of In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that claims to cloned animals were not eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C §101 because the cloned animals are copies of products of nature. A key factor in the decision was that, although cloned animals are not completely identical to the animals from which they were copied, the differences between them were not claimed. The biotech community should take note of this decision which has important implications for the patentability of many biotech products as well as how to draft claims to avoid problems under §101.

New USPTO Guidelines for Interpreting Patent Eligibility under Myriad and Prometheus Cases

March 6, 2014

By Kara K. Fairbairn and Mia E. Mendoza

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) just published new guidelines advising examiners and the public of the factors for determining whether an invention satisfies the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of patent eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §101 under their Myriad and Prometheus holdings.

Speaker, University of Minnesota Biology Colloquium, September 2016
Co-Presenter, “Design Applications and the Hague System,” 2016 Midwest IP Institute, September 22-23, 2016
Co-Presenter, “Design Patent Law and Practicing Under the New Hague System,” 2015 Midwest IP Institute, September 17-18, 2015

Honors & Education

EDUCATION

University of Nebraska School of Law, J.D., 2001
University of New Hampshire School of Law, Franklin Pierce Center for IP, IP Summer Institute, 2000
Pepperdine University, Biology, 1999

BAR ADMISSIONS

Minnesota, 2002
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, 2001

Professional Activities

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

3-Time Attendee of USPTO Design Day in Washington D.C.
Co-Chair of Women in Intellectual Property Law Association Committee, 2013
LifeScience Alley Organization Women’s Roundtable Member, 2012-2014
American Intellectual Property Law Association
Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association

COMMUNITY

Co-Chair of School Auction, St. Thomas More Catholic School, 2015-present
Former Board Member, Can Do Canines, 2006-2009